English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49647/84944 (58%)
Visitors : 7711280      Online Users : 69
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/105209


    Title: 兩岸強制汽車責任保險之比較研究
    Other Titles: A comparative study on the compulsory automobile liability insurance between Taiwan and China
    Authors: 陳志種;Chen, Chih-Chung
    Contributors: 淡江大學保險學系保險經營碩士在職專班
    廖述源
    Keywords: 強制汽車責任保險;交強險;承保與理賠;費率釐訂;coverage and claim;the setting of premium rate;the supervisory
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2016-01-22 14:50:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文論述台灣強制汽車責任保險法令依據之演變,從「單軌制」到「雙軌制」,再演變成目前的「單軌制」過程,歷經多年運作,新制強制汽車責任保險之法律依據已告完備,且保額逐年增加而保費則多次調降,廣受社會大眾好評,亦讓新制強制汽車責任保險制度趨臻健全;而大陸於2006年7月1日實施機動車交通事故責任保險,近年來保額與費率亦有調整,但大陸實施交強險以來,其經營問題在一定程度上與制度設計的缺陷有關,因此探討台灣與大陸強制汽車責任保險的制度架構,及經營成效與問題,尤其重要。
    本文分析台灣與大陸強制汽車責任險責任基礎、保險金額、承保項目及範圍、理賠處理方式,其研究範圍分就歷史沿革、相關法規、承保與理賠、費率釐訂及保險監理概況相互做一個比較,期使在大陸經營交強險業務的台資企業有初步的瞭解,並進而從中比較兩者之間優劣處,藉以改善不足之處,讓雙方制度更加完善,最後,提出結論與建議事項,俾供日後保險業者及相關人員之參考。
    This study initially draws the development data of the Compulsory Automobile Liability Insurance (CALI) in Taiwan. Over years’ implementation, from single-track system into dual-track system, then evolving into nowadays single-track one, the CALI act has been fully operated. Also, the insured amount has gradually increased while the insurance premium has repeatedly cut down; it not only receives public praise, but also makes the amended CALI getting perfect. On the other hand, the Compulsory Automobile Liability Insurance has come into force in China on July 1, 2006. Since the government of China introduced the insurance law, though the insured amount and the insurance premium has also adjusted these years, the problem lies to some extent in the scheme of the institution. Thus, it’s important to compare the structure of the act and the current situation and problems between both insurance policies in Taiwan and China.
    This study analyzes the difference of the CALI between Taiwan and China in their foundation of liability, the insured amount, benefits items and range of coverage, and claim processing. The research divides into several comparisons according to the general situation of legislative history, related laws, coverage and claim, the setting of premium rate, and the supervisory framework. The researcher hopes to provide basic comprehension for Taiwan-funded enterprises which serve for the CALI in China. Moreover, through the comparison of both policies’ pros and cons, two laws are in hope to be improved. Finally, the study offers the conclusion and suggestion for a reference to the insurers and related staff.
    Appears in Collections:[保險學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML48View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback