English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 52333/87441 (60%)
Visitors : 9096853      Online Users : 295
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/104918

    Title: 圖哈切夫斯基與蘇聯文武關係之研究 : 兼論俄式大縱深作戰
    Other Titles: Marshal of the Soviet Union Mikhail Tukhachevsky and Soviet civil-military relations : extend study on Soviet Deep Battle
    Authors: 朱奕;Chu, I
    Contributors: 淡江大學國際事務與戰略研究所碩士班
    洪陸訓;Hong, Lu-Xun
    Keywords: 圖哈切夫斯基;文武關係;蘇聯;Tukhachevsky;Soviet Party-Military relations;USSR
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2016-01-22 14:43:03 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 圖哈切夫斯基元帥是蘇聯軍事思想大家,其所完善的「俄式大縱深作戰」是蘇聯作戰體系的主流,同時也是從1930年代到蘇聯解體前的最先進作戰理論之一。然而西方世界的文武關係研究者對於這位因為1937年史達林發動大整肅而死亡的軍事思想家並沒有進行充分的研究,而是對於1950年代同樣因政爭而受害的朱可夫元帥的研究著墨甚深,充分的表現了西方世界對蘇聯文武關係研究的偏好。
    第三,史達林可能未曾想要消滅圖哈切夫斯基等人所建立的俄式大縱深作戰理論,該理論可以說是當時最先進的理論之一,不同於閃電戰理論,該理論強調癱瘓而非圍殲、注重速度、規模、突然性,並且具有連續性。俄式大縱深作戰理論在圖哈切夫斯基等人被整肅之後研究被嚴重延宕,以至於蘇聯紅軍得在第二次世界大戰的東線戰場上重新摸索改良。最終成為美國John Powell少校所認為的,美國及其西歐北約盟國所無法抵擋的作戰方式。
    The Marshal of the Soviet Union Mikhail Tukhachevsky was a great mind of soviet military thought, the “Soviet Deep Battle”, which he had perfected had been the mainstream of soviet military operation thought, as well as one of the most sophisticated operational theories from the 1930s to the end of the cold war. But western studies of soviet civil- military relations haven’t shed much light on the marshal’s death, but instead focused on the misfortune of another Marshal of the Soviet Union, Georgy Zhukov, revealing the preference of western soviet civil-military study.
    This thesis discusses the “Case of Trotskyist Anti-Soviet Military Organization”- the case which saw the murder of Tukhachevsky, and the civil-military relations of the incident, as well as the operational theory “Soviet Deep Battle” and its influence.
    The findings are as below:
    First, the “Case of Trotskyist Anti-Soviet Military Organization” is an incident of party-military conflict, which corroborates the view of Amos Perlmutter, as well as the cyclical pattern of the soviet civil-military relations and other theories of Soviet civil-military relations.
    Secondly, Stalin made his way to power using his position as chief secretary to take over the party, then using the orthodoxy of the party to attack his enemies. his position also allowed him to place his own men as well as men he may use as instruments onto strategic positions within the party, the soviet government and the nation’s security service, then taking every possible occasion to suppress his enemies using the nation’s security service now in his pocket, forging his dictatorship over the nation, which was very differs from Lenin’s reign of “Democracy within the party”.
    Lastly, Stalin himself might not have desired the destruction of the “Soviet Deep Battle” concept. The concept was the most modern theory at the time, stressing paralyzing instead of annihilation, emphasizing speed, scale, surprise, and bears continuity. The purge of Tukhachevsky and his colleagues severely slowed the theory’s development. Yet the second world war provide the soviets with ample experience to improve the theory, making it the operational method that Major John S Powell of the US Armed forces believed to be unstoppable for the NATO forces in Europe.
    Appears in Collections:[國際事務與戰略研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback