English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 51258/86283 (59%)
Visitors : 8027460      Online Users : 74
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/104617


    Title: 教科書審定委員對教科書設計的關注焦點探討:以國小中年級社會學習領域為例
    Other Titles: Study on Textbook Reviewers’ Concerns on Textbook Design: Taking the 3rd and 4th Grade Elementary Social Studies as Examples
    Authors: 塗宥騏;陳麗華
    Keywords: 社會學習領域;教科書設計;教科書審查;social studies;textbook design;textbook review
    Date: 2014-03-01
    Issue Date: 2016-01-06 11:04:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討國小社會教科書審定委員對教科書設計的關注焦點。研究對象及方法有二:一是以內容分析法,探討2010至2011年國小中年級社會教科書審查意見所呈現的對教科書設計的關注焦點,總共分析翰林、康軒、南一等三個版本,每個版本有四冊、共計12冊的審查意見。其二是訪談法,對象為2010至2011年的國小中年級社會領域審定委員五位,探討其在執行審查工作時,在教科書設計方面的關注焦點、原因、背後的審查原則,以及影響其對教科書關注面向的因素。
    本研究發現,審查意見及審定委員對教科書設計的關注焦點具一致性,大抵上最關注教科書的文本設計及圖表設計,最不關注版式設計。此外,檢視其關注焦點的共通思維發現,其背後的審查原則為重視教材的正確性、文句易懂流暢、提升高層次思考,以及多元且平衡的觀點。
    The study aims to explore the major concerns on textbook design shown by the review committee on elementary school social studies textbooks. The research design included content analysis and an interview approach. A total of 12 textbooks from 3 publishers were involved in this study, each textbook with one set of Textbook Review Comments. Quantitative content analysis was employed to examine the committee's concerns based on the 12 sets of Textbook Review Comments. A semi-structured interview was conducted with five committee members to explore their concerns on textbook design. The major findings of the content analysis and interview were coherent: the most important concerns on textbook design were text and graphs/charts; the least important concern was the layout. The key underlying principles expressed in the reviews were the accuracy of the materials, the fluency of the text design, highordered thinking, and multiple and balanced perspectives.
    Relation: 教育研究集刊=Bulletin of Educational Research 60(1),頁115-163
    DOI: 10.3966/102887082014036001004
    Appears in Collections:[課程與教學研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML71View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback