淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/103405
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62805/95882 (66%)
Visitors : 3910469      Online Users : 350
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/103405


    Title: 瑞典與新加坡創新政策之比較研究:國家創新系統觀點
    Other Titles: A Comparative Study of Innovation Policy in Sweden and Singapore: National Innovation System Perspective
    Authors: 陳意文;王美雅
    Keywords: 國家創新系統;創新政策;創新活動;政策規劃;National innovation system;Innovation policy;Innovation activities;Policy-planning
    Date: 2015-06-01
    Issue Date: 2015-07-17 16:55:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 全球競爭壓力下,各國已將「創新」從科技與產業政策配角視為各國施政主軸;而學界對創新的理解更已從崇尚科學與技術推動的第一代線性創新,演變至強調整合與連結的第五代創新系統;故創新不僅是新發明或新技術,而是研發、生產到行銷等活動與外部環境互動及回饋的結果。而勾勒創新政策亦應從單向的技術發展轉為開放創新平台,亦即透過國內各種制度與組織間交流,進而促使創新正向發展。本研究以2014年全球創新指數(Global Innovation Index,簡稱GII)的迴歸分析為基礎,採用國家創新系統觀點,以瑞典與新加坡作為分析的標竿國家。研究發現,發展「需求導向」與「區域型」計畫、設計彈性及透明的制度,並成立專責創新機構而建立回饋機制等,皆有助於建構並強化創新系統。
    "Innovation" has been changed from a supporting character to a main role in technology and industry policy planning. However, the concept of innovation has evolved from the first generation, which was linear and science-oriented, to the fifth generation that emphasizing on integration and connection. Therefore, innovation is not only inventions or introducing new technologies; it should be a result of the interaction and feedback from the environment with R&D, production and marketing in firms. Thus, the planning for innovation policy should not merely focus on technology development but also emphasize on the open innovation platform, which means that innovation will be facilitated by interacting with national institutions and organizations. This study is based on the regression analysis of the Global Innovation Index, choosing Sweden and Singapore as the benchmark of innovation policy from the perspective of national innovation system. Results show that developing a demand-oriented and regional master plan, designing a flexible and transparency institutional system, establishing a dedicated agency and setting up a feedback mechanism will contribute to construct and enhance national innovation system.
    Relation: 企業管理學報 105,頁1-29
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Information and Communication] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML221View/Open
    瑞典與新加坡創新政策之比較研究:國家創新系統觀點.pdf976KbAdobe PDF1View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback