淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/101881
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 64198/96992 (66%)
Visitors : 7943718      Online Users : 8492
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/101881


    Title: 後設認知策略融入國中英語字彙學習之研究
    Other Titles: A study of metacognitive strategy instruction on English vocabulary learing for junior high school students
    Authors: 王雅蘭;Wang, Yie-lan
    Contributors: 淡江大學教育科技學系數位學習在職專班
    黃雅萍;Huang, Ya-Ping
    Keywords: 後設認知策略;英語字彙策略;英語字彙學習;metacogntive strategies;vocabulary strategies;vocabulary learning
    Date: 2014
    Issue Date: 2015-05-04 09:20:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 對台灣莘莘學子而言,學習英語能擁有大量字彙是不可或缺的。但英語字彙學習可能是經常被學生們所忽略(Zimmerman, 1997)。許多研究發現具後設認知能力的學生可以幫助其英語字彙的學習。因此,本研究旨在探討後設認知策略對國中學生學習英語字彙之成效。
    本研究的主要發現摘述如下:
    一、不同教學策略對英語字彙學習表現的影響情形
    (一)教學策略與英語科程度有顯著的交互作用。
    (二)對英語科程度高分組而言,後設認知策略暨英語字彙策略教學優於
    與後設認知策略教學與傳統教學法;對中分組而言,後設認知策略
    暨英語字彙策略教學優於與後設認知策略教學與傳統教學法。
    (三)對後設認知策略暨英語字彙策略教學而言,高分組與中分組均優於
    低分組;對傳統教學法而言各組間無顯著差異。
    二、不同教學策略對後設認知的影響情形
    (一)教學策略與英語科程度有顯著的交互作用。
    (二)對英語科程度高分組而言,後設認知策略暨英語字彙策略教學優於
    傳統教學法;對中分組而言,後設認知策略暨英語字彙策略教學優
    於傳統教學法。
    (三)對英語字彙策略教學而言,英語科程度高分組與中分組均優於低分
    組;對傳統教學法而言各組間無顯著差異。
    據此建議國中英語教師可將後設認知策略融入英語字彙教學課程中,可提昇學生學習英語字彙能力與表現、後設認知能力。
    It is very crucial for the students in Taiwan to acquire rich vocabulary, yet English vocabulary learning might be the part often neglected by students (Zimmerman, 1997)。A lot of researches found the students who have metacognitive skill can help their learning in English vocabulary. Thus, this study intends to examine the effects of Metacognitive strategies teaching on English vocabulary learning performance for the junior high school students.
    Based on the data analyses, the findings of the present study are summarized as follows:
    1. Effects on English vocabulary performance by different teaching strategies:
    (a) There is significant mutual interaction between teaching strategies and levels of English learning achievement.
    (b) As for the high-level group, Metacognitive strategies and English vocabulary learning strategies surpasses the traditional teaching; for the medium-level group, Metacognitive strategies and English vocabulary learning strategies surpasses the traditional teaching.
    (c) And with respect to Metacognitive strategies and English vocabulary learning stratgies, both high and medium level groups are superior to low-level group.
    However, no significant difference is shown when concerning traditional teaching
    is concerned.
    2. Effects on Metacognitive skills by different teaching strategies:
    (a) There is significant mutual interaction between teaching strategies and levels of English learning achievement.
    (b) As for the high-level group, Metacognitive strategies and English vocabulary learning strategies surpasses the traditional teaching; for the medium-level group, Metacognitive strategies and English vocabulary learning strategies surpasses the traditional teaching.
    (c) And with respect to English vocabulary learning stratgies, both high and medium level groups are superior to low-level group.However, no significant difference is shown when concerning traditional teaching is concerned.
    By above mentioned statements, we proposed some suggestions that the English teachers can utlize Metacognitive strategies into the English vocabulary lessons. It may promote the students'' English vocabulary performance and metacognitive skills.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Educational Technology ] Thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML281View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback