關鍵詞：校長領導風格、學校創新經營 Title of Thesis: A Study on Relationships between Principal''s Leadership Style and School Innovation Management of Elementary School in New Taipei City Total pages: 182 Key word: principal''s leadership style、school innovation management Name of Institute: Executive Master’s Program in Educational Policy and Leadership, Tamkang University Graduate date: June, 2014 Degree conferred: M. Ed. Name of student:TSAI WEI CHUNG Advisor: Chi-Chang Hung 蔡惟中 洪啟昌 Abstract: The purpose of this study is to investigate the current situationsand relevance of Principal''s Leadership Style and SchoolInnovation Management and to analyze the differences betweenPrincipal''s Leadership Style and School Innovation Management in different environmental variables. The literatures analysis and sampling questionnaire surveywere utilized for the data collection. According to studypurpose ,study question and literatures review, the questionnaire「The Principal’s Leadership Style and School InnovationManagement in New Taipei City」.The number of effective samples is 437. The data are analyzedusing the methods of t-test, one-way ANOVA, product momentcorrelations and multiple regressions.The main findings were as follows: 1. The principal’s leadership style presents multiple-dimension,among which the Task-based advocacy leadership style was perceived most. 2. In schools whose principals’ ages are 40 years to less than 50, the principle’s leadership style is more perceived by teachers. 3. In schools whose are located in remote areas, the principal’s leadership style is more perceived by teachers. 4. Principal’s leadership style is more perceived by teachers aged 50 years and older, and with part-time tasks ofvice president. 5. Teachers perceive school innovation managements at mid or high level, among which “ Teaching Innovation ”most and “ Administrative Management Innovation ” least. 6. There was a positive correlation between principal’s leadership style and school innovation management. 7. Principal’s leadership style could effectively predict school innovation management. The research results were further discussed in this study and, according to the discussions, some suggestions were provided for school administrative units, teachers, and researchers.
