English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 52333/87441 (60%)
Visitors : 9096177      Online Users : 289
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/101423

    Title: Teacher modeling on EFL reviewers' audience-aware feedback and affectivity in L2 peer review
    Authors: Carrie Yea-huey Chang
    Contributors: 淡江大學英文學系
    Keywords: Teacher modeling;L2 writing;Audience awareness;Affectivity;Peer review
    Date: 2015/07/01
    Issue Date: 2015-04-29 10:52:49 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Pergamon Press
    Abstract: This exploratory classroom research investigated how prolonged one-to-one teacher modeling (the teacher demonstrating desirable behaviors as a reviewer) in feedback to student reviewers’ essays may enhance their audience-aware feedback and affectivity in peer review. Twenty-seven EFL Taiwanese college students from a writing class participated in asynchronous web-based peer reviews. Training was conducted prior to peer reviews, and the teacher modeled the desirable reviewer behaviors in her feedback to student reviewers’ essays to prolong the training effects. Pre-modeling (narration) and post-modeling (process) reviews were analyzed for audience-aware feedback and affectivity. Reviewers’ audience awareness was operationalized as their understanding of reviewer–reviewee/peer–peer relationship and reviewees’ needs of revision-oriented feedback on global writing issues to improve the draft quality. Paired t-tests revealed significantly higher percentages of global feedback and collaborative stance (revision-oriented suggestions), more socio-affective functions, and a higher percentage of personal, non-evaluative reader feedback and a lower percentage of non-personal evaluator feedback in the post-modeling reviews. Such a difference, however, was not found in review tone. Overall, our findings confirm that EFL student reviewers can learn peer review skills through observation of their teachers and use of complementary tools such as checklists.
    Relation: Assessing Writing 25, pp.2-21
    DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2015.04.001
    Appears in Collections:[英文學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    Chang 2015.pdf748KbAdobe PDF348View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback