淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/100664
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62822/95882 (66%)
Visitors : 4024597      Online Users : 1311
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/100664


    Title: Comparative Studies on the Regional Differences of Modularity Design Tendency Between the United States and Japan
    Authors: Yu, Ying-Chang;Tomonari Yashiro;Satoshi Yoshida;Zhi, Qiu
    Contributors: 淡江大學建築學系
    Keywords: modularity;integration;task dependency;design structure matrix;design information
    Date: 2015-01-15
    Issue Date: 2015-03-09 13:37:04 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Architectural Institute of Japan
    Abstract: A standard architectural project comprises multiple interfaces among individual modules of information, components, systems, or players. Each society possesses its own history and background that derives a unique pattern of modules and interfaces. In 2005, Prof. Tomonari Yashiro and Prof. Satoshi Yoshida identified the antagonistic concept of design tendency between modularity and integration. Players from different countries tend to manage projects on different levels of modularity or integration, and create unique work system structures for each. The effects of the difference between modularity and integration were identified, but the mechanism was not demonstrated in visualized or quantified models.
    This research identifies the United States as the most oriented to modularity and Japan as the country most oriented to integration. The Two countries were the focus of analyses to demonstrate the effect of using the task structure matrix (TSM). The TSM analysis model is a method to visualize and quantify the module pattern and relationship by recording the dependencies of all the elements. This research sought to verify the different pattern of regional modularity between the United States and Japan, as well as offer a quantified understanding to help transnational project players identify the critical paths that are potentially omitted from a project.
    Relation: Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 14(1), pp.49-56
    DOI: 10.3130/jaabe.14.49
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Architecture] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    14_49.pdf期刊論文電子版3094KbAdobe PDF444View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML41View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback