English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 51258/86283 (59%)
Visitors : 8015508      Online Users : 38
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/100147


    Title: 歐洲統合:亞太區域合作之典範或例外
    Other Titles: The European Integration:Model or Exception for Asia-Pacific Regional Cooperation
    Authors: 卓忠宏
    Contributors: 淡江大學國際研究學院
    Keywords: 歐洲聯盟;亞太經濟合作會;開放式區域主義;新區域主義;EU;APEC;Open Regionalism;New Regionalism
    Date: 2012-07
    Issue Date: 2015-02-02 14:13:44 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 嘉義縣:南華大學社會科學院歐洲研究所
    Abstract: 歐洲聯盟及亞太經濟合作會議兩種截然不同之區域統合模式。在1990年代之前,歐洲統合提供地理位置相近國家藉由經濟合作促進區域安全穩定的發展模式。1990年代之後,歐洲多元化統合模式成為其他區域合作模仿典範。但歐洲統合經驗是否可作為亞太區域整合之模式?有些學者抱持否定看法,認為亞太國家內部歧異性過大;但有些學者反而對亞太多元化發展持正面看法。文章主要在比較歐洲聯盟與亞太區域經濟合作兩區域組織之異同。內文分為五部分:除前言外;第二部分定義區域主義之類型;第三在解析兩區域組織主要特色發展;第四從歐洲統合經驗檢驗亞太地區能從中學習之處;最後做出總結。
    The EU and APEC are often described as two very different approaches to regional integration. The idea of Europe, as a most successful region in the global system, would have a similar model. Western Europe before 1990, offered an attractive model of formal economic integration among countries within a geographically well-defined security and stability. And Europe, after 1990, offered a more multiple example for that other regions could learn. However, is the model of European integration an applicable experience to Asia Pacific? Some arguments denied the possibility of regionalism in Asia-Pacific, as contrasted with the EU, in its diversity. Some scholars positively evaluate its diversity in Asia-Pacific specific value.This paper focuses mainly on the similarities and differences between the EU and APEC from the perspectives of comparative analysis. The content is divided into five sections: the introduction; a second section defining the varieties of regionalism; an explanation of the main determinants on the formation of regional block in Europe and Asia-Pacific; the fourth sectio...
    Relation: 歐洲國際評論=European Journal of International Review 8,頁39-57
    Appears in Collections:[歐洲研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML117View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback